attention power
from Diary 2025-05-27
attention power
When a person P has 1000 Attention Power and wants 10,000 Ps to listen to him.
It is impossible to allocate Attention Power 1 to 1,000 people in the first place.
Allocating 1 Attention Power to 1,000 people is not usually done.
The person who is asked is selected according to SOC, such as past relationships, and receives mixed attention: one person receives 100 attentions, another 50, and so on.
Receiving 100 Attentions" and "discussing at length" are roughly equivalent.
When this "listener" is a politician, it means that many people's voices are not heard.
Consider this situation undesirable and improve it.
10000 people discuss at length with the AI, the output of which the AI organizes and makes available for reading in 100 attentions.
This composition was in place before AI.
10 assistants each paid 100 attentions to conduct interviews, which were summarized into a readable version with 10 attentions and feedback to P for a total of 100 attentions.
It was expensive because it required the use of a large number of smart people.
AI is causing price destruction.
2025-06-01
It used to be the norm to have 0, and we are trying to increase it by improving the system, thinking that it shouldn't be 0, right?
In this situation, those who insist on "donating 100 by conventional means" are putting their efforts in the opposite direction from the direction of improvement.
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/アテンションパワー using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.